FOOTNOTE PAGE THREE

2-12-13 : see image and flow (4F?)

2-13-13 : Plank (b.s.) A. The History of B.S., B. Health Care Summit (sc), C.Enough? (sc), D. , E. I'm not saying..., F. , G. Co-Wink-E-Dink?, H. A Shot in the Arm?, I. In the begining..., J. A PEAS meant... (sc), K.Two Points (sc), L. Legislation not politics!, M. Walking the Plank[!] (sc)

{L}:*  review of (sc)=[Scroll Click]. The hyperlinked headings that are sorted from the (b.s.)=[blog search] are sometimes not to the post they head. Hence one can scroll and see that they are not the link under (sc). But the (sc) will contain the link of the heading.[ or as evolved 4-4-13 below*]

2-14-13 (F P too?) A.  B. (sc)   C. (sc)

2-28-13  (Breaking Bread?)
(b.s.) Irony+chef = Rocket Man?[!] , I Ron Knee Chef
(b.s.) Buffet+food= The Big Cheese (sc)

*4-4-13 (link inserted) (sc) evolved ABC's will be used to carry the link that is for some reason of the (b.s.)'s algorithms not in the heading.)

Rocket Man?[!]

 

...OFF ?

 

The irony or Mittstory is in the geometrics, and might be the in-f-able [!] 

The launch pad is another matter but it takes 3 points to make a plane, and this is a blank 'f 'n odd footnote.  But stinking to the story or retro-jets, this is the 4th post-note or footnote*. 

 

 * anachronism may be moved/adjusted later

[The point for now is that I am behind on the follow-up in the area of the first three posts for this month.  And then after the last bulky post and plan to asterisk or footnote, found that those original 3 had many of the images I had just 4-matted un-a-knew[!] Now that is the ticket.  Almost.

a. I Ron Knee Chef

b. In the Beginning

c. REFRAIN is a Heckuva Paradocs[!]

d. A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the News Stand ouch

e. Calm Pend E Um

f. Total eclipse of the

g. 4A? FOOTNOTES: SEPTEMBER 2012

h. Catch-22?

i. In the Mean Time...

j. (anomoly^ of al gore rhythm and heading?)

k.

l.

m.

n.

Oh and the reality is that things change, not that they are right in the first or next place, but for now I think I have logged the links correctly if not as planned.

2-point-oh... and "lables"la not LGF for now. 

 

^ (b.s.)= blog search 4 (sic)+pun and at this time includes "a." thru "n." which will off** course change with time if not also algorithms of BlogSpot beyond my understanding.  But one anomoly of that sort appears just as I switched 4mat between "i." and "j.", not that I did not trigger something I just don't know why I chose to save some time and effort if not meaning and the "headings" switched from being self-linked to prior linked, upon scrolling over them.  In the Mean Time...  ...  SIX SIGMA .  And I better stop now before who knows what. 

 

** not to make dark of the light (but that was a typo... I ...THINK.)

 

Q ED ?

Stardate: 10.18.12.9.53pdt

 

[Update: under construction or*** 4Mat review.]

*** i.e. footnotes re:GPS'n. Countdown to Current?(dot/dot/dot)

Actually I am burying a link. Best Wishes4Fishes.  And Beyond(TimAllen)Bu'hhhh-Dump-ump[!]

 

 

I Ron Knee Chef

Ctrl F Kitchen

Obama Takes it to the Kitchen.
OK, Lawrence O'Donnell is not there yet.[*]
True Man Label: Bring it On.

* 1-5-11 Lawrence O'Donnell: McCain Courage, Mormon Cult(ure) and perfect family. (Mitt Romney)
Recess appointment is perfect politics.  Make our** day. (not to get Harry) i.e. take it to court or the people
Is Obama the 75% man?  Mitt may be politically perfect, or the least of how many evils?
Trump wanted some enthusiasm, but who am I to be enthused by the choice of an even weaker candidate to face Obama?  I hope the Republicans give us their best.  It is a process that just might do that.  Unfortunately their best for some Republicans, Libertarians, and farther wrongs would be worse for the country. A flip-flopping un-nuanced Romney is their best shot.  Someone more extreme*** would be better for the race and the country by allowing Obama to carry the middle left.

** dirty Truman and his spatula
[Later The Daily Caller and Neo-Nuanced R's. ]
*** link added (**also & Neo)
[Neo-Bush, Frank/Dodd and Obamanomics.]
[Rachel Maddow, Star Chamber]
[Ed Schultz, Randi Rhodes, Thom Hartmann, Lawrence O'Donnell]

1-6-11 Paul Harvey, The Rest of the Story. "not really".
Jobs-check, Cuts-check, debt next, but that means revenue also. As for certainty?
Note: use of punctuation, (sic)/pun, "air quotes" or lack of... c-BTW/irony.
(Ctrl F: "best" link inserted above)
[Rachel Maddow follow up or vise verse us ? Steele and Obama!]
[Santorum: Civil ad cert'em, a lesson in logic and taking the 9th.]
[Lawrence O'Donnell follow-up and tetra heed run ! (c-1-5 "courage":It was noted that it would be a lack of courage for McCain not to endorse a Republican candidate at this late date.  So he endorses after the first delegates have been selected?  Typical fear of fear monger.)]
BTW:  China Or Germany? Which Economy Stupid? This proves you can learn from others, but it doesn't say what.

Awkward Breaking(BTW/Less Embedded)News(Ein, Ein, Ayn?)
i.e. next post/segue!
Speaking of Newt Eyed Peas, what he said to the NAACP.
Just demand jobs instead of food stamps?  Not to be snarky.

< previous post >